Thursday 4 January 2018

Women Wearing Yajnopavit Suggestive of Equal Rights of Women for Education


A writeup by Shri Nilesh Oak gathered my attention considerably on ‘Women doing ‘Sandhya’ & ‘Homa’ and wearing ‘Yajnopavit’ – 14000+ years long Indic tradition. 'https://nileshoak.wordpress.com/2017/10/28/women-doing-sandhya-homa-and-wearing-yajnopavit-14000-years-long-indic-tradition/#comment-1142



Pic courtesy by Sahana Singh ji from Bharhut gallery

On the comment side, Dr. Shridhar Iyer’s suggestion limits the yajnopavit ritual only till the Agnichayan Yajna or the like which has this type of arrangement for Hota’s patni-wife. The Iconography of women bearing the yajnopavita in different postures do suggest her invariably wearing of it despite of any yearly ritual happening. So bearing of the yajnopavit clearly suggests girls wearing them from very tender age when they were induced in learning of the Vedas and Shastras equally like boys. 

यथे मां वाचं कल्याणीमावदानि जनेभ्य:। ब्रह्मराजन्याभ्यां शुद्राय चार्याय च स्वाय चारणाय॥यजु। अ ,२६।२॥
yathe māṃ vācaṃ kalyāṇīmāvadāni janebhya:। brahmarājanyābhyāṃ śudrāya cāryāya ca svāya cāraṇāya॥yaju। a ,26।2॥

which says “As I have given this word (i.e, the 4 vedas) which is the word of salvation for all making-Brahmanas, Kshatriya, Vaishya, shudra, women, servants,aye, even the lowest of the low, so should you all do, i.e, teach and preach veda. Let all men therefore read and recite, teach and preach the veda and thereby acquire true knowledge, practice virtue, shun vice, and consequently being freed from all sorrows and pain, enjoy true happiness.”  

ब्रह्मचर्येण कन्या३ युवानं विन्दते पतिं॥अथर्व ११,१६,३,१८
brahmacaryeṇa kanyā3 yuvānaṃ vindate patiṃ॥atharva 11,16,3,18

which says “ Just as boys acquire sound knowledge and culture by practice of Brahmacharya and then marry girls of their own choice, who are young, well educated, loving and of like temperament, so should a girl practice Brahmacharya, study the Veda, and other sciences and thereby perfect her knowledge, refine her character, give her hand to man of her own choice, who is young, learned and loving.” it follows, therefore, that girls should also practice Brahmacharya and receive education. It was mandatory to curtail any imbalance of knowledge, thoughts and warfare between Husband and Wife. For initial years of their begotten children mother is always held as first Acharya for her child. In ancient India, Gargi and other ladies, were highly educated and perfect scholars of the Vedas. this is clearly written in Shatapatha Brahmana

कन्यानां सम्प्रदानं च कुमाराणां च रक्षणम्॥मनु ७।१५२॥( this shloka is a misplace in original Dayanand Saraswati ji's anuvāk/works; trying to figure out the correct one)
kanyānāṃ sampradānaṃ ca kumārāṇāṃ ca rakṣaṇam॥manu 7।152॥

Manu says, “The State should make it compulsory for all to send their children of both sexes to school at the said period( 5th or 8th year) and keep them there for the said period(minimum the 16th year for girls and the 25th year for boys) till they are thoroughly well-educated.
In other words , let no child - whether a girl or a boy be allowed to stay in the house (father’s house) after the 8th year; let him remain in the seminary till his samāvartana time, (i.e, period of Return Home) and let no one be allowed to marry before that.

The above elaboration clearly suggests what a refined society we had in the Vedic times where women equally got education, and thus she was equally entitled to bear/wear yajnopavit.

Tuesday 2 January 2018

When Agastya Gave Away His ‘Height’ as a ‘Unit Of Measure’ For Length.



Professor Whitney opines,
“ We regard the Hindu's science as an offshoot from the Greek, planted not far from the commencement of christian era, and attaining its fully developed form in course of fifth and sixth century."

These sanskrit scholars do know what our scriptures have in them, but they revolve around their own created omphalo of imparting ignorance to the world either probably to keep up contentment with the antiquity of Christianity imperiously, or they are truly ignorant.

RV VIII Fifth aṣṭaka says 

उदियाय ततो अगस्त्य: शम्यामात्रो महितपः
मानेन सम्मितो यस्माद् मान्य इहोच्यते॥

Thence rose the great ascetic Agastya of the measure of a span, as measure by measure, (māna) he is then called upon mānya

Other such examples come from RV VII.33.13, for Mānya from RV I.165.15,177.5,184.4 etc. Agastya Muni, Kuru Muni, i.e., Dwarf Muni is also known as Māna

मानः (पुं) [मन + घञ]

मानं (नपु)- मापना, माप दण्ड, मान दण्ड

मानदण्ड(पु)- मापने का डण्डा, गज- स्थितः

‘पृथिव्या इव मानदण्ड:’  

Striking use of unit of measure-yardstick in Kumārsambhava by Kalidās in a mangalācharanam; i.e, beginning of first shloka, brought in the word ‘mānadaṇḍa’ as yard stick incessantly. For a moment I thought if it has anything to do with Agastya-Māna; anumāna was made. 

अस्त्युत्तरस्यां दिशि देवतात्मा हिमालयो नाम नगाधिराज:। 
पूर्वापरौ तोयनिधी वगाह्य स्थित: पृथिव्या इव मानदण्ड:।।

Though I rubbish the PIE root system which is nothing but deformed form of sanskrit root, still has gathered a momentum due to a creation of database of other languages as well. The process of PIE is very contemporary which can always be solved with the help of Sanskrit root system if verb fallen prey. I searched PIE root for ‘meter’ and to my astonishment found ‘me’. Greek metron (measure) influenced english meter “person who measure”[ late 14c], agent noun 'mete'.

I deliberated to understand measurement techniques from antiquity, way back from vedic times. How much did we know about the measurement? 
We find
अङ्गुष्ठमात्रक aṅguṣṭhamātraka ; having the length or size of a thumb
अङ्गुल aṅgula ; twelve angula making a vitasti or span
अङ्गुलमान aṅgulamāna ; measure of length of an angula
व्यङ्गुल vyaṅgula; having the length of an angula
वितस्ति vitasti ; span or having a measure of length
अवत्नि avatni ; primarily means ‘elbow’ occurs frequently in RV VIII,80 denoting as a measure of length, the distance from elbow till tip of the hand. etc. Therefore, we had enough of measurement techniques.

We find unit of measure for length in Akbar and post Akbar period as-‘Gaz' mainly which would have had come from ‘gaja' sthita~goad, yard~length, typically like Kerala thotti (hook), which is 3.5 feet in length and about 1 inch thick; the valya mol(long pole), which is 10.5 feet in length and about 1 inch thick.

1 yard = 0.91444m is almost equivalent to gaz
Length: Ilahi Gaz (33" to 34"); 1 Gaz = 16 Grehs; 1 Greh = 2 pais
At the time of  Shah Jahan there existed three different Gaz:
a) Shahi gaz = 101.6 cm; b) Shahijahani or Lashkari = 95.85 cm; c) Aleppo gaz = 67.73 cm

Usually, dwarf people have typical heights ranging from 2'8" to 4'8." It is possible that Agastya muni himself had been hardly of 3 feet height.  

For Rgvedic Māna~Mānya it can be said that Agastya muni was the first man who gave his height as a unit of measure for length. 





Featured post

The purpose of Darśana-Śāstra

Darśana-Śāstra is a serious act to do a philosophy. Acts something like kāka-danta-parikṣā or jala-tāḍana are useless exercise without any p...