Tuesday, 2 June 2015

Latin ambō and Sanskrit amba (अम्ब)

Latin ambō’s inflection suggests dual (as it has no singular), and also means ‘podium’ and amphi; with an emphasis on ‘viewing’ from both sides and on the podium (anything viewed is also only with two eyes). Here this goes with amba ‘k’ (neut.) for ‘an eye’. Strangely, we may have lost the use of ambau as an obsolete term in Sanskrit when we advanced further into pre-Pāṇinian or Pāṇinian Sanskrit with the introduction of the ka-pratyaya (क प्रत्यय) in amba (अम्ब), as in tryambakam (त्र्यम्बकम् = त्रि + अम्बकम्) and not ambāḥ (अम्बाः) [anything more than two, i.e. plural–bahuvacana] for ‘three eyes’ (Śiva?). But ambo, ambau, ambai/ambae remained in many Proto-European languages… ‘ambience, ambient’ for ‘viewing’ in English is one such derivative.

अम्बते { अम्ब् } ambate { amb } verb sound ? 
अम्बति { अम्ब् } ambati  { amb }      verb go 

( http://spokensanskrit.de/index.php?tinput=amb&direction=SE&link=yes&choice=yes )

“अम्ब गतौ (भ्वादिः, परस्मैपदी, सकर्मकः, सेट्) — ambati ‘goes’ (gacchati, in the sense of ‘as swiftly as a star’), hence ambakam (स्वार्थे क्), i.e. ‘an eye’ [as advised by Ācāryavarya Rāmānujan Devanāthan @Iksusara ji].
(While I could read only the ātmanepada form ambate through the TDIL morph generator, I am always at a loss, being a non-Sanskritist, so pardon me.)

“अम्ब्यते गर्भे प्राप्यते इति (घञ्, स्वार्थे क् च) — ambakam = ‘father’ [as explained by Ācāryavarya Iksusara ji]. While ‘amma-abbaa’ (Persian) ~ sounds like amba if spoken together, amba (Buginese) for ‘father’ appears to be the lost Sanskrit ambau; yet pitarau remained (mātā ca pitā ca), preserving the sense of duality of parents being together [bahuvrīhi].”

Now, among these, the interesting find is this: in Hindi/Urdu we say ‘जहां तक नज़रें जातीं हैं’ = dekhna (‘till the eyes go’, meaning ‘as far as the eyes can see’). The translated meaning of this sentence in English sounds absurd, since eyes do not go anywhere; rather, light travels and reflects back to the eye, so that the image of the object is formed — and that science we all know.

Our Sanskritists knew that anything with gati (गति) is amba (अम्ब). So ambaka = ‘eyes which receive light’, ambara, ambaraga (‘sky-going’), ambarada (‘giver of clothes’), and ambate {अम्ब्}/ambate {amb} as the verb ‘sound’ (since sound travels = gati, which they already understood). Eureka!

This may be a brief story of how ambo–ambae–ambi (in the sense of ‘dual’) developed into amphi (where the sense of seeing with both eyes extended to seeing from both sides), and then became an upasarga in theatron, giving amphitheater(‘to be seen from both sides’). From there it likely carried forward into derivatives such as ambulate, circumambulation, ambulance, ambience, amicable, and others.

This is, of course, a very premature stage to draw conclusions. It remains rather a note to myself in the attempt to understand Sanskrit grammar and its application on linguistic terms at this initial stage.

Perhaps this might interest archaeolinguists. I do not know how far I have managed to disintegrate or penetrate into Amba. As I mentioned, my words are so coiled up that there is yet an absence of Śeṣa to spring forth — once again, a matter for discussion.

Saturday, 1 March 2014

Riders of the tide

Who Says Indians Were Not Good Mariners?

India’s maritime heritage can be traced back to Vedic times. Although chronological records of events from this period are scarce, early Indian texts clearly reflect knowledge of seafaring, navigation, and commerce. Long before recorded history, India, the cradle of one of the world’s oldest civilizations, sustained a tradition of maritime activity that endured despite numerous upheavals. Evidence of this tradition, spanning over four millennia, is attested in the geography of India’s long coastline, archaeological excavations, and ancient scriptures.

The ocean, the concept of seafaring, and the cyclical movement of water are deeply embedded in Indian thought and literature. Anthropomorphic transformation of natural elements into deities illustrates how maritime realities shaped cultural imagination. In India, it has been customary to acknowledge the gifts of nature by offering reverence to their presiding deities. Thus the Vedic prayer:

“Śaṁ no Varuṇaḥ” – May the lord of the oceans be auspicious unto us.

Varuṇa was revered as the knower of sea routes and of the seasons of sailing. The Ṛg Veda (1.97.7–8) declares:

“Do Thou, whose countenance is turned to all sides, send off our adversaries as if in a ship to the opposite shore. Do Thou convey us in a ship across the sea for our welfare.”

Myth, Cosmology, and Maritime Symbolism

The maritime imagination is interwoven with cosmology. Creation is described as emerging from the cosmic ocean: Brahmā is born of the lotus that rises from Viṣṇu’s navel as he rests upon the waters. In myth, gods and demons churn the ocean for nectar (amṛta), from which Lakṣmī, goddess of wealth, is the first jewel to arise.

The Pāṇis—merchant clans mentioned in the Ṛg Veda and later texts—were pioneers of long-distance trade, linking diverse nations. Classical sources suggest that the Phoenicians may correspond to these Pāṇis. The Latin Phoeni closely resembles Sanskrit Pāṇi. The parallel traditions of Dvārakā and Phoenician chronology have even been interpreted as indicating shared antiquity, with figures such as Hercules (Hari-kula) symbolizing Phoenician maritime enterprise.

Archaeological and Textual Testimonies

The Śiśupālavadha of Māgha mentions merchants in ships laden with goods, sailing between Dvārakā and Hastināpura. Terracotta models at Lothal suggest contact with Egyptian ports of the Nile Valley civilization. Indus seals, found in large numbers at Mohenjo-daro and Harappa, appear to have been used by merchant families to mark ownership of goods.

Buddhist and Jain scriptures, as well as the Mahāvaṁsa chronicle of Sri Lanka, contain references to shipbuilding, overseas trade, and maritime activity. One account narrates how the merchant Pūrṇa, of Suppāraka, undertook seven voyages and eventually became a disciple of the Buddha.

Manu Smṛti and Maritime Law

The Manu Smṛti, among the oldest law codes in the world, contains provisions for commercial disputes relating to both land and sea trade. It specifies rules for interest on marine loans (bottomry), boat-hire, and even marine insurance: sailors were held collectively responsible for damage caused by their faults but absolved if the damage was due to uncontrollable natural forces. These rules testify to the sophistication of maritime law in ancient India.

European scholars such as Sir William Jones and Mountstuart Elphinstone noted that the presence of bottomry in Manu’s Code proves that Indians were navigators in that era. The Rāmāyaṇa also mentions maritime practices, island nations (Yavana-dvīpa, Suvarṇa-dvīpa), naval expeditions, and merchants engaged in overseas trade. The Mahābhārata similarly refers to naval expeditions, shipwrecks, and sea-borne commerce.

Later Traditions and Foreign Testimony

Greek and Roman sources describe Indian ports, particularly in Gujarat. The Periplus of the Erythraean Sea (1st century CE) gives detailed accounts of maritime routes linking Roman Egypt, Africa, and India. Archaeological evidence confirms Indo-Roman exchange, as seen in finds at Arikamedu, Ter, and coastal Buddhist cave sites.

Maritime trade from Gujarat and the Konkan coast extended to Southeast Asia, leading to early cultural exchanges. Indian merchants and monks established communities in Java, Sumatra, Cambodia, and Thailand, leaving enduring legacies such as Angkor Wat and Borobudur. In turn, Southeast Asian rulers patronized Indian monasteries, cementing the exchange.

Navigational Science and the Kutchi Mariners

Contrary to the belief that Indians depended on Arab nautical science, indigenous traditions reveal sophisticated navigational techniques. The Malam-ni-pothi (“sailor’s handbook”) contained stellar bearings, rhumb lines, compass cards, pole-star calculations, latitude and longitude reckoning, and sailing instructions. Surviving logbooks (ghos ni pothi) from as early as 1663 CE display cartographic stylization and terminology rooted in Sanskrit.

Kutchi pilots gained renown for their seamanship, even assisting Vasco da Gama on his first voyage to India. The shipbuilding yards of Mandvi, with traditions extending back to Patan and Tharad, reflect a legacy of maritime craftsmanship, adapted over centuries.

Conclusion

As Sir Charles Eliot observed:

“Scant justice is done to India’s position in the world by those European histories which recount the exploits of her invaders and leave the impression that her own people were a feeble, dreamy folk, cut off from the rest of mankind by their seas and mountain frontiers.”

The literary, archaeological, and technical evidence firmly disproves such misconceptions. India’s mariners—whether the Pāṇis of the Veda, the merchants of Lothal, the pilots of Gujarat, or the carriers of Buddhism to Southeast Asia—testify to a long and sophisticated maritime tradition, deeply embedded in the cultural memory and civilizational fabric of the subcontinent.

Featured post

Anubandha-Catuṣṭaya

While I was going through the commentary of Rāmatīrtha in Maitāyaṇī (Āraṇyaka) Upaniṣad I came across the phrase incorporating siddhāntanuba...